Canada was colonized a very long time ago. The times have changed and so have the “settlers” views on aboriginals, but there still is a small tinge of racism circulating. Taiaiake Alfred wrote “The Ethics of Courage” that entails some possibilities that the Onkwehonwe people can take to overcome the struggle against the negative effects of colonialism; that still are in effect today. His voice is stern but inquisitive about previous attempts of revolution and if they could or could not apply to today’s day and age.
Alfred uses a few examples of people trying to overcome the oppressors by revolution. For example, the French did well for the Vietnamese people in the sense of improving education, transportation, communications and infrastructure but their unfair demands; racism and exploitation burdened onto the Vietnamese were pushed too far. The French regime and Vietnamese ideas did no coincide with each other, so an armed revolution was a way, “to replace imperial rule with a self-determining Vietnamese state.” Ho Chi Minh stated, “one doesn’t in fact gain independence by throwing bombs and such. That was the mistake the early revolutionaries all too often made. One must gain it through organization, propaganda, training and discipline.” They traded arms with the Soviet Union and China to accomplish autonomy from the French. An armed attack wouldn’t happen because that the Onkwehonwe people would most likely not give their lives for a revolution against the state. Violence would make the real idea Onkwehonwe such as suffering from racism on all levels any effective way of fighting it would vanish. Alfred believes that liberation cannot be accomplished with violence because if it ever was successful would lead to more violence. The Onkwehonwe people follow principles similar to Gandhi’s of non-violence and using words to inspire people to stand up and take action, such as demonstrating acts of autonomous courage. To speak out and effectively accomplish zeroing out racism that’s embedded into colonial societies would dangerous because it could push people out of their comfort zone and surpass acceptability.
The audience would be most likely First Nations people because he refers to Caucasians as “settlers” and “evil colonizers” throughout the essay.
The troubles that effect the Onkwehonwe of racism can be overcome and having that mind state is what Alfred believes is the true ethics of courage. He wants to put that notion into our minds that it would be overall more positive for the future if that were a continuing idea.
Alfred uses a few examples of people trying to overcome the oppressors by revolution. For example, the French did well for the Vietnamese people in the sense of improving education, transportation, communications and infrastructure but their unfair demands; racism and exploitation burdened onto the Vietnamese were pushed too far. The French regime and Vietnamese ideas did no coincide with each other, so an armed revolution was a way, “to replace imperial rule with a self-determining Vietnamese state.” Ho Chi Minh stated, “one doesn’t in fact gain independence by throwing bombs and such. That was the mistake the early revolutionaries all too often made. One must gain it through organization, propaganda, training and discipline.” They traded arms with the Soviet Union and China to accomplish autonomy from the French. An armed attack wouldn’t happen because that the Onkwehonwe people would most likely not give their lives for a revolution against the state. Violence would make the real idea Onkwehonwe such as suffering from racism on all levels any effective way of fighting it would vanish. Alfred believes that liberation cannot be accomplished with violence because if it ever was successful would lead to more violence. The Onkwehonwe people follow principles similar to Gandhi’s of non-violence and using words to inspire people to stand up and take action, such as demonstrating acts of autonomous courage. To speak out and effectively accomplish zeroing out racism that’s embedded into colonial societies would dangerous because it could push people out of their comfort zone and surpass acceptability.
The audience would be most likely First Nations people because he refers to Caucasians as “settlers” and “evil colonizers” throughout the essay.
The troubles that effect the Onkwehonwe of racism can be overcome and having that mind state is what Alfred believes is the true ethics of courage. He wants to put that notion into our minds that it would be overall more positive for the future if that were a continuing idea.